Skip to decision
ESAIC AI Company Brain
0113The promise

Studio Ruelle + Soulware for ESAIC

One trusted ESAIC answer. Wherever members ask.

William made AI assistance real inside ESAIC. The next step is to make it dependable, governed and reusable: the public website first, then only the integrations and channels that prove worthwhile.

Decision requestedApprove the ESAIC AI Company Brain direction and the €6,000 public website phase.
See the opportunity
AI assistantHow can I help?

Ask about registration, examinations or membership.

Website · Phase ImyESAIC · CandidateEmail · LaterMessenger · Later

The pressure

The same questions arrive again and again.

On peak daysUp to 1,500

registrations in a single day

When does registration close?Which documents do I need?Where do I register?Who should I contact?
Every year15,000–30,000

registrations, across countries and time zones

Registration & exams team

The answers often exist. Users still have to find, interpret and trust them. When they cannot, the question lands with ESAIC’s people.

Make ESAIC easier to reach. Keep the team available for the cases that need expertise.

Planning ranges from the original ESAIC notes.

Build on the momentum

William made the idea real.

People already use it. It proves the value of a short answer, the right link and a clear next step. Now ESAIC can define the standard behind those answers.

William proves the format. Phase I proves the standard.
William correctly provides the myESAIC password reset link and support email
Asked to reset a password, William gives the direct reset link and the right support route.

Observed on 11 August 2026

When an answer carries ESAIC's name, it must be correct.

We tested William across 60 realistic questions. Three examples show where the next level begins.

William links the official EDAIC Part I page but says it lacks the deadline
Direct

The answer was on the page.

William links to the correct EDAIC Part I page, but cannot give the registration deadline shown on it.

The user still has to search. The support question remains.
1 / 3
Direct answers. Verified facts. An experience built around ESAIC.
About the evidence

These examples show William as observed on 11 August 2026. They do not prove that every issue is an unfixable Jotform limitation. The complete benchmark contains 60 synthetic cases and original screenshots.

The reframe

The chatbot is only the surface.The value sits behind it.

The ESAIC AI Company Brain is one governed foundation for approved knowledge, ESAIC rules, quality tests and human routes.

Approved sources

Phase IPublic ESAIC website
Working candidatemyESAIC
As ESAIC expandsSelected systems

ESAIC AI

Company Brain
KnowledgeRulesTestsHuman routes
Govern once. Improve everywhere.

Trusted experiences

Phase IPublic website assistant
Potential nextEmail & Messenger
LaterFuture ESAIC channels
Not another destination for members to find.One foundation behind the channels they already use.

A natural ESAIC next step

Useful AI. Governed to an ESAIC standard.

ESAIC's own research, European projects and recent member choices point to the same model: one place for trusted knowledge, with validation and human oversight built in.

01 / Its published stance

Close alignment is not complete agreement.

Research co-authored by ESAIC's current President and Board members found close alignment between leading LLMs and clinical guidelines, but not complete agreement. Missing citations mattered. Their conclusion: validate AI with clinician feedback.

Read the published study ↗
02 / AI is already part of the work

ESAIC already helps shape AI and data infrastructure.

Through ICUdata4EU, COVend, ENVISION and related European programmes, ESAIC has worked on federated ICU data, AI-supported therapy and real-time decision support.

Explore ESAIC's EU projects ↗
What this means hereOne trusted place for ESAIC knowledge, available through every approved channel.

Make it tangible

From “here is a page” to “here is the answer.”

One real questionWhat is the registration deadline for the next EDAIC Part I examination?
Current experienceLink, then search
Current William answer for the EDAIC Part I deadline
“I don’t have the exact registration deadline for the next EDAIC Part I exam.”
Proposed experienceAnswer, source, action
EVAEVA by ESAICAI assistant
Registration closed

EDAIC Part I 2026

Registration closed on 11 June 2026 at 23:59 CEST.

The examination takes place on Saturday, 19 September 2026.

View official Part I informationOfficial ESAIC source: EDAIC Part I Examination
Direct answerCurrent statusOfficial sourceClear action

Observed and verified on 11 August 2026.

Who makes this real

The people who pitch stay for the build.

TL
Studio Ruelle

Tom Leunen

ESAIC’s web partner. Brings the brand, website and integration context.

IW
Soulware

Ivan Westerhof

AI product builder and Campfire founder, with experience across more than 50 conversational AI projects.

Selected public assistants from Ivan's work at Campfire

Three channels. Three focused jobs. Open the real service.

Only publicly reachable work is shown. Assistants delivered behind customer logins, apps or intranets are intentionally left out. Availability remains controlled by each organisation.

Pilot. Prove. Scale.

Six weeks from approval to a measured release.

A two-hour kickoff creates the rules. Three bounded ESAIC rounds validate them before anything goes live.

  1. 1

    Week 1

    Decide together

    Kickoff, scope, sources, redirects, privacy and test plan.
  2. 2

    Weeks 2–3

    Build

    Knowledge, safeguards, answer experience and website integration.
  3. 3

    Early week 4

    Test round 1

    ESAIC tests prepared cases. We integrate one feedback package.
  4. 4

    Late week 4

    Test round 2

    Retest changes and run the complete quality set again.
  5. 5

    Week 5

    Accept

    Final ESAIC round, release fixes and approval.
  6. 6

    Week 6

    Launch

    Production embed, checks and a controlled public release.
After launchEight weeks alongside ESAIC

Automated checks, weekly quality sampling and four focused follow-up calls.

A controlled path

Start with one win. Build from proof.

The first release solves a real support problem. Every later step reuses what works and keeps its own approval point.

Approve now€6,000

Public website assistant

Approved public pages, sourced answers, safeguards, client testing, launch and eight weeks of launch support.

Optional next+€25,000

Company Brain core

The governed foundation plus one read-only internal integration. myESAIC is the working candidate, only after discovery confirms access, value and fit.

Optional laterUp to €9,000

Selected channels

Facebook Messenger and human-reviewed email drafting, if the confirmed connectors and workflow fit the allowance.

Core path€31,000
Current full directionUp to €40,000

One direction. Three controlled decisions.

Today's approval€6,000

The €25,000 core and channel layer return as separate decisions after proof and discovery.

What happens after launch?

Phase I hosting and model usage are expected at €50 to €80 per month. A mature multi-source, multichannel service currently plans at €10,000 to €15,000 per year plus usage, confirmed after integrations, traffic and support levels.

Cited. Validated. Human-governed.

ESAIC stays in control.

Technology can change. ESAIC’s knowledge, rules and quality standard stay yours.

01

Approved knowledge

Each domain has an owner. No approved source means no invented answer.

02

Clear boundaries

Medical, personal and sensitive questions follow approved routes.

03

Continuous validation

Every correction and human review becomes a test before the next release.

04

Ownership without lock-in

ESAIC owns the application, configuration, policies and evaluation suite.

Always visibly AI.Raw conversations are not stored by default.Hosting, retention and access are approved before launch.

Questions worth answering

The direction is ambitious. The first decision is not.

The Board's questions are reasonable. Each one has a concrete answer and a controlled next step.

Board question 01

We already have William. Why do we need this?

The short answer

William proved the format and the appetite. The next decision is whether ESAIC only improves one interface, or sets a shared standard for accurate answers that can serve every approved channel.

No forced replacement

William can remain in place while the public website phase is tested.

A higher standard

Citations, versioned tests and safe fallbacks become release requirements.

A reusable investment

Improvements belong to one ESAIC foundation, not one interface.

1 / 6
The proposal remains the sameApprove €6,000. Prove one useful release. Decide what follows from evidence.

The decision

Approve the direction. Start with one useful release.

A small first commitment. A reusable foundation. A clear path to the full vision.

DirectionEndorse the ESAIC AI Company Brain.

The shared foundation for future ESAIC AI experiences.

Phase IApprove the €6,000 public assistant.

A controlled first release using approved public information.

KickoffNominate the owner and workshop team.

Confirm the two-hour September kickoff and begin.

Decision requestedApprove Phase I and schedule kickoff.

On approval, confirm the owner, participants and kickoff date.